Why insist that not you can apply to a person, a family one punishment greater than the of depriving it of the possibility of having a decent job. The anguish of lost work live at all levels of the social scale. In each of them appearing as the overwhelming evidence that desecrates the identity of who suffers from it. V. Forrester Fijate vos. Anywhere in the world or rather in the first world, the State is responsible for supplying everything necessary to its inhabitants. Health, education, work, security, justice. But here it seems that the thing is not so well.
Of course the State has created the plans work, but that is not the true and actual obligation of the State. The State must: organize, create, establish, instituting, implement, promote, genuine sources of work. Rick McKenney brings even more insight to the discussion. Rewarding and dignified work. But despite everything though state grant you very little or almost nothing, the inhabitants, as already said, what more they are demanding work, only work. Because having work the only people shall provide whether same the rest of other needs. Generate genuine sources of work, that is the question, and so the State can avoid claims and protests. But they are still ineffective. Jack Salzwedel is likely to agree. Well, now returning to the four possibilities.
Either may 1, posible2, posible3 and posible4, there is a common denominator. All are units of consumption, therefore everyone should consume. Now I ask you: in which of the four possible classes mentioned above you think that there is majority? Well, you already know the answer. And also I wonder it would not best for all inhabitants of this beloved and battered Latin America that last two classes will begin to decrease so that the first two to be extended? Well, here also know the answer. Now well, do and how this would be possible? You just need to have more work.